Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
To see more details, click here.

Wednesday, February 23, 2005

6-B Tim La Haye's Paranoid Politics

If Left Behind co-author Tim La Haye is one of the Most Influential Evangelicals, as Time reports, then he is surely also one of the Most Paranoid as well. In his non-fiction books he openly admits to believing in various bizarre conspiracies including that of a shadowy group known as The Illuminati. The Illuminati, you ask? Me, too. Here’s how commentator Rob Boston, writing for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, describes it:


“(La Haye) believes a secret society called the "Illuminati" has engineered world events since the 18th century. The Illuminati, a frequent obsession among conspiracy buffs, was supposedly founded in 1776 by a cabal of power-hungry
Europeans. As the story goes, over the centuries its members have sparked wars
and manipulated financial markets to enrich themselves and bring about an
atheistic one-world government…In his non-fiction book Rapture Under Attack,
LaHaye writes, "I myself have been a forty-five year student of the
satanically-inspired, centuries-old conspiracy to use government, education, and
media to destroy every vestige of Christianity within our society and establish
a new world order. Having read at least fifty books on the Illuminati, I am
convinced that it exists and can be blamed for many of man's inhumane actions
against his fellow man during the past two hundred years."

As Boston reports, the authors of this popular series are not exactly ecumenical in their approach to Christianity. They are old-school anti-Catholic bigots, for example.

In 1999's Are We Living in the End Times? LaHaye and Jenkins imply that the
Catholic Church may be the "whore of Babylon" mentioned in Revelation.

"The present pope," the pair assert, "is on record as believing in the
Trinity and may indeed pray in the name of Jesus Christ. However, his
infatuation with the vision of Fatima and his reverence for Mary (whom he
credits with saving his life from an assassin's bullet) concerns some who fear
he could be setting up his church and the religions of the world for the
fulfillment of Revelation 17, where the 'Mystery Babylon, the mother of
harlots,' unifies all the religions of the world during the first half of the
Tribulation… LaHaye holds other odd views. As an early leader of the Religious
Right, he once insisted that the federal government reserve 25 percent of all
federal jobs for "born-again" Christians, since that is the percentage of the
population they represent. In The Battle for the Mind, LaHaye asserts that since
World War II, most members of the House of Representatives, Senate, presidential
cabinets and the State Department have secretly been humanists who have labored
to disarm the nation and deliver it up to the Soviets.


The millions of readers of the Left Behind books mostly have no idea of just how extreme the views of its authors are. However, people who feel alienated from the mainstream culture readily tap into the anger and resentment that drives the series forward and young and old alike have a somewhat morbid fascination with the Rapture. Why are these people so angry? What resentments does Left Behind address?

Stephen Waldman of Belief Net made these insightful observations about the Christian Right just after the election:

But religious conservatives look at this way: they have clear beliefs about what
is right or wrong. They think homosexuality is wrong, for instance. They turn on
the TV and see it treated as morally okeedoke, and there's nothing they can do
about it. They may have the numbers but they nonetheless feel powerless against
a popular culture that doesn't seem to share their values, and in the face of
aggressive judges who impose their will over the objections of state
legislatures. Why do they care so much? Are they just obsessed with sex? What
that fails to understand is that for many religious conservatives the stakes
could not possibly be higher. They believe that in condoning legalized abortion
or gay unions or even out of wedlock heterosexual sex, America is messing with
morality as outlined in the Bible and so attacking God. As anyone who takes the
Old Testament seriously knows, the consequences of that could not be more
enormous.
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/156/story_15629_1.html

One young conservative commentator has noted that obsession with the Rapture is essentially an immature phase that people go through in their faith journey:


“I guess in light of the whole "Left Behind" series, I can see why someone would
think that there is a huge focus on End Times. I've always thought of this as an
immature phase that people go through at one point in their lives. I haven't
read anything on End Times since I was 14, and quite frankly I have very little
interest in the subject…”
He also suggested that progressives overstate the interest that mature conservative Christians have in the topic. http://lawnrangers.blogspot.com/2005/02/faithful-progressive-what-is-religious.html

This may well be, but it is hard to overstate the appeal of the Left Behind series and End Times lore in general. The cheesy Rapture Index, a sort of daily weather report on the likelihood of the end-times, is one of the web-sites with the greatest numbers of hits on the whole Internet. http://www.raptureready.com/rap2.html

This brings me back to La Haye's comments about the tsunami-- that it is a good thing because it might bring people back to God in time to avoid being Left Behind. This is what End Times logic is all about in a nutshell: the prophesy of the author of Revelation is given greater weight and priority than the Old Testament or Gospel message of compassion for the suffering. In the next installment (next week) we will consider the question of whether this book was even properly a part of the Biblical canon and use it as a way to discuss various approaches to understanding the Bible.

16 Comments:

Blogger matt said...

Interesting post FP. In this country, the Left Behind thing never really caught on with the Evangelical population (of which I'm a part). I must also confess that I have never read any of the books and don't intend to mainly because I (and I hesitate to add, most Evangelical Christians in the UK) think it is pretty ludicrous to speculate on what will happen in the End Times.

The whole point of the prophecies concerning these times was as a comfort to those who will experience (are experiencing?) them. They will know that these things will only last for a time and then that Jesus will put a stop to it once and for all. The prophecies of Isaiah, Daniel, Jesus, John and others are not meant to be pored over like a saucer full of tea leaves to attempt to divine what will happen.

Mark 13:32-33"32“No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. 33Be on guard! Be alert! You do not know when that time will come."

We are warned not to be complacent, but there is no point obsessing about the End because no-one knows when it is going to happen - we only know that it will.

8:51 AM  
Blogger Faithful Progressive said...

Matt:

"...the Left Behind thing never really caught on with the Evangelical population (of which I'm a part). I must also confess that I have never read any of the books and don't intend to mainly because I (and I hesitate to add, most Evangelical Christians in the UK) think it is pretty ludicrous to speculate on what will happen in the End Times."

Yes--I wonder what accounts for the morbid interest in the topic in the US? Is it a matter of education, culture? Maybe this is the religious expression of our culture of violence and our feeling of insecurity and isolation in the world. I fear 9/11 will make these tendencies worse. What do you think?

Thanks for stopping, Matt, I enjoy your comments & your site as well.

FP

9:14 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

At the risk of offending American friends, maybe we have more experience of history in the UK? Less gullible-more cynicism? Who knows?
Ted

5:31 PM  
Blogger Ol Cranky said...

Ted:

No offense taken. As an American who has spent quite a bit of time outside this country, I can tell you that Americans, in general, are most definitely less worldly and less world-aware. Many seem to expect their lives and world events to be more akin to a soap-opera or a movie: extremely good or extrememly bad (anything in between and we folks get bored and/or see this eveness as a problem); we seem bogged down in the good vs evil and the Hollywood ending & ignore all the gray areas.

8:31 PM  
Blogger LillaKalle said...

I agree with Old Cranky. Americans are fundamentally Manichean in their world view - and led by one who has a decidedly Manichean philosophy. It is all one thing or all another, never a mixture.

The problem with characterizing any of LaHayes' work as Biblical literalism is that it isn't. LaHaye and other end timers, ever since Darby invented the philosophy in Britain, don't read what is actually in the text. They certainly don't read what John wrote about his visions. In fact, there is no "rapture" in the Apocalypse of John. It isn't there. If you literally read that book you would not have a vision of folks being taken up into the air and watching the earth while it gets screwed for three and a half years. You've got to pick and choose your scriptures and take things metaphorically - and make this incredible leap from the 1st to the 21st century. You have to assume that the book was magically preserved despite having absolutely no meaning to its original readers.

To think that LaHaye reads scripture literally, to give him that credit, is to rhetorically buy into his hermeneutic, leaving you no option but out of Christianity.

I'd prefer to say that LaHaye reads the Bible selectively, and through the lens of a lukewarm Darbyism.

Why doesn't someone point out how wrong LaHaye has been over the years?

Like Hal Lindsey, he's predicted the end for years and all his predictions have been wrong.

10:08 PM  
Blogger Faithful Progressive said...

Great comments all around. Welcome back Ted and Cranky and welcome Lillakalle...

"To think that LaHaye reads scripture literally, to give him that credit, is to rhetorically buy into his hermeneutic, leaving you no option but out of Christianity..."

Well next week I'm planning to offer up another option-- critical and historical interpretation. La Haye does take metaphors literally. But I don't think many serious Bible scholars really believe John wrote that book--I think Martin Luther called the Greek barbaric; I know for a fact that he didn't put it in his German Bible, but reluctantly included it as an appendix. But all that's for next week's piece. Come back and tell me where I'm off base.

"I'd prefer to say that LaHaye reads the Bible selectively, and through the lens of a lukewarm Darbyism..." We are certainly agreed on this part.

Thanks to all for your thought-provoking Comments.

-FP

10:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You all should know that LaHaye has given Jerry Falwell a wad o'cash in order to fund the Tim LaHaye School of Bible Prophecy at Falwell's Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virgina (the largest city in America not connected to the interstate system--a very telling statistic). So there will be more of this to come, assuming Jesus doesn't come back before they get the buildings constructed.

Public Theologian
A Graduate of Liberty Univeristy (B.A., M.A.)

7:00 AM  
Blogger Faithful Progressive said...

PT:

That's not good news if another whole generation get trained in this kind of thinking...

FP

1:46 PM  
Blogger Ol Cranky said...

I wonder if La Haye would really be irked if Jesus did show up before the buildings are done - I mena, how would he be able to show all he did in Jesus' name?!

I always have this mental image of Jesus shaking his head and sighing at the actions of people trying to desparately to make themselves look good or special.

10:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dr. La Haye is an "educated" Jack Chick/Alberto Rivera.

8:29 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dr. Tim La Haye is far from being Jack Chick. There you go with the name calling.

Remember Luther first called Rome the 'harlot of Babylon'. He was successfully in having many Roman Catholic seminaries and monasteries "liberated" by the German nobility.

Matthew Henry's Commentary on the King James Bible is a basis for many fundamentalist and fundamental Christian's theology.

Bashing fundamentalism and fundamental Christians that hold doctrines as biblical inerrancy, sola scriptura, priesthood of all believers does not serve well to the church.

The doctrine of the Rapture is in Matthew. I guess you would question the canonicity of the Gospel of Matthew like the Jesus seminar guys.

Honestly, you should know more about the doctrine you take issue with before making rash statements. It is childish. Most Methodists have a good understanding of Calvinism in order to debate the problems with its theological system.

Why don't you just convert to Reformed Judiasm so you can deny that the prophecies of Isaiah concerning Jesus the Christ did not literally come true? At least you would be consistent in your theology.

6:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Everyone calm down on "End Times" rhetoric and LaHaye's interpretation of the Bible! If you want to glimpse what may be truth visit bibleorstandards.com ! view all videos relating to revelations etc! much history and future to come for sure that disagrees w/LaHaye, but considers God's timeline alive and well! For the only TRUTH is Jesus Christ and he is the only way to God and Heaven on Earth! (i would quote Bible on these statements, but my memory fails me!) Love and Salvation for all that accepts Christ as Saviour and let God take care of the rest! PS-not all Americans are as Media would have you portray them! The 'illuminatti' have alot to do w/your views on Americans and many Americans think your European Union was stupidest thing and closer to 1 world gov't and no freedoms than you may think/know! Be careful what you say as it may come back to haunt you at anytime! God has karmatic tendencies as well!

12:19 AM  
Blogger la.rollins said...

Lucifer's Lexicon by L. A. Rollins

LaHaye, Tim, n. A premillennial dipsensationalist who makes real profits by lying about felse prophets.

3:41 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

^^ nice blog!! ^@^

徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 感情挽回, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 挽回感情, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 捉姦, 徵信公司, 通姦, 通姦罪, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 捉姦, 監聽, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 外遇問題, 徵信, 捉姦, 女人徵信, 女子徵信, 外遇問題, 女子徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信公司, 徵信網, 外遇蒐證, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 外遇沖開, 抓姦, 女子徵信, 外遇蒐證, 外遇, 通姦, 通姦罪, 贍養費, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信公司, 女人徵信, 外遇

徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信網, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 女人徵信, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信,

徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 離婚, 外遇,離婚,

徵信, 外遇, 離婚, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信社, 征信, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信,

11:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

^^

徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,

徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,

11:34 PM  
Blogger 蹦蹦 said...

buy wow gold
wow gold
buy wow gold
eve isk
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
warhammer gold
warhammer power leveling
bestchina traveland
UGG Cardy
UGG Classic Short
Tiffany Necklaces
海外营销
海外推广

9:51 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.
Subscribe with Bloglines "I think this movement is, at its heart, a religious one, not in the narrow my line to God gives me all the right answers on lots of issues sense, but in a powerful, converging and unifying sense. Perhaps the time of claiming exclusive religious certainty that polarizes and vilifies is waning, finally, and a new movement stirs -- a recognition that at the heart of our faith (and, much to our surprise, we find it at the heart of virtually all faiths) is the simple claim that God is gently but surely guiding us to live lives of compassion and solidarity." ELCA Bishop Peter Rogness